News Categories

Other stories in Electricity

Tagcloud

AEP, anaerobic digestion, Anglian Water, Australasia, Benelux, BG Group, billing, bills, biomass, bristol water, British Energy, British Gas, Business Stream, call centres, carbon capture, CCWater, Centrica, CHP, climate change, coal, competition, complaints, connections, Conservatives, Consumer Focus, consumer research, cost of capital, credit crunch, customers, Cyprus, Czech Republic, debt, Decc, Defra, Denmark, Department of Energy and Climate Change, distributed generation, Dong, drainage, Drax, Drinking Water Inspectorate, Eastern Europe, eco-towns, economy, EDF, EDF Energy, effic, Efficiency, efficiency, electricity, electricity distribution, electricity generation, electricity retail, electricity transmission, emergencies, emissions, emissions trading, ENA, Enel, Energy, energy, energy distribution, energy generation, energy policy, energy retail, Energy retail, energy services, energy transmission, engineering, environment, Environment Agency, Eon, ERA, Essent, Eurelectric, Europe, European Commission, European Union, finance, Finland, flooding, France, fuel poverty, gas, gas distribution, gas retail, gas storage, gas supply, gas transmission, gas transport, Gazprom, GDF Suez, geothermal, Germany, health and safety, Heat, heat, Iberdrola, industrial relations, infrastructure, Infrastructure Planning Commission, innovation, interruptions, Ireland, Italy, jobs, leakage, legal, LNG, maintenance, metering, MPs, National Grid, NEA, Netherlands, NI Water, NIAUR, Nordic, Northern Gas Networks, Northern Ireland, Northumbrian Water, Npower, nuclear, offshore, offshore wind, Ofgem, Ofwat, ofwat, Ombudsman Service, operations, ownership, pan-utility, people, planning, po, policy, pollution, poverty, price review, protest, quality, regulation, renewables, research, Russia, RWE, Scotia Gas Networks, scotland, Scotland, Scottish and Southern Energy, Scottish renewables, Scottish Water, ScottishPower, security of supply, selling, Severn Barrage, Severn Trent, Severn Trent Water, sewerage, skills, smart grids, smart metering, solar, South West Water, Southern Water, Spain, storage, streetworks, sustainability, Switzerland, tariffs, Thames Water, thames water, trading, unbundling, United Utilities, utility engineering, Vattenfall, vehicles, Veolia, waste management, wastewater, wastewater treatment, water, water abstraction, water distribution, water efficiency, water neutrality, water resources, water retail, water supply, water treatment, Water UK, water uk, weather, Welsh Power, Welsh Water, Wessex Water, Wics, wind, WWU, Yorkshire Water, zero-carbon development

< Wind power could undermine carbon reduction agenda, says report | Ministers launch latest climate change billboard campaign >

Oil spill costs energy company £20,000

Written by: Annabel Andrews | 23 November 2009

Lochmaddy Sheriffs court has fined Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution £20,000 for an oil spill at its Loch Carnan Power Station on South Uist in the Outer Hebrides last November.
The energy company, part of Scottish and Southern Energy, pleaded guilty to spilling 45,000 litres of red diesel. The fuel leaked from a corrosion hole in an oil tank, bypassed the secondary containment system and entered both groundwater and Loch Carnan. The case was brought by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa).
Hazel MacLeod, SEPA's investigating officer, said: "Diesel and fuel oil can have a severe polluting effect on a watercourse. The oil forms a film over the water and therefore prevents oxygen exchange from occurring resulting in low levels of oxygen which can lead to the death of fish and invertebrates. The death of invertebrates also has an impact on fish life.
"The discharge of oil in this instance was not and would not be licensed by SEPA. It had an impact on the use of the water for recreation, not only through the direct pollution and damage to amenity caused by the oil itself, but also through the associated construction of a breakwater to assist in the oil clean up exercise.
"The hole in the storage tank was small, and would not have been easily identified. However, the bund surrounding the oil tanks was not fit for purpose as it had a permeable base. Had a secondary containment system that was fit for purpose been provided at the site, oil leaking from the tank would have been contained within the bund, and would not have been able to escape the site and enter the water environment. Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution Plc is aware of the requirements of the oil storage regulations but despite this, during a recent upgrade of the bunding at this site, they neglected to provide bunding to the area directly underneath the oil storage tanks."

Tags: environment, pollution, Scotland, Scottish and Southern Energy, water

Comment on this story

Report Abuse