News Categories

Other stories in Electricity

Tagcloud

AEP, anaerobic digestion, Anglian Water, Australasia, Benelux, BG Group, billing, bills, biomass, Bristol Water, British Energy, British Gas, budget, Business Stream, call centres, carbon capture, CCWater, Centrica, CHP, climate change, coal, competition, complaints, connections, Conservatives, Consumer Focus, consumer research, cost of capital, credit crunch, customers, Cyprus, Czech Republic, debt, Decc, defra, Defra, Denmark, Department of Energy and Climate Change, distributed generation, Dong, drainage, Drax, Drinking Water Inspectorate, Eastern Europe, eco-towns, economy, EDF, EDF Energy, effic, Efficiency, efficiency, electricity, electricity distribution, electricity generation, electricity retail, electricity transmission, emergencies, emissions, emissions trading, ENA, Enel, energy, Energy, energy distribution, energy efficiency, energy generation, energy policy, Energy retail, energy retail, energy security, energy services, energy suppliers, energy supply, energy transmission, engineering, environment, Environment Agency, Eon, ERA, Essent, Eurelectric, Europe, European Commission, European Union, finance, Finland, flooding, France, fuel poverty, gas, gas distribution, gas retail, gas storage, gas supply, gas transmission, gas transport, Gazprom, GDF Suez, geothermal, Germany, health and safety, heat, Heat, Iberdrola, ice, industrial relations, infrastructure, Infrastructure Planning Commission, innovation, interruptions, Ireland, Italy, jobs, leakage, legal, LNG, maintenance, metering, MPs, National Grid, NEA, Netherlands, NI Water, NIAUR, Nordic, Northern Gas Networks, Northern Ireland, Northumbrian Water, Npower, nuclear, offshore, offshore wind, Ofgem, Ofwat, Ombudsman Service, operations, ownership, pan-utility, Parliament, people, planning, po, policy, pollution, poverty, pri, price review, pricing, protest, quality, re, regulation, renewables, research, Russia, RWE, Scotia Gas Networks, scotland, Scotland, Scottish and Southern Energy, Scottish Power, Scottish renewables, Scottish Water, security of supply, selling, Severn Barrage, Severn Trent, Severn Trent Water, sewerage, skills, smart grids, smart metering, solar, South West Water, Southern Water, Spain, storage, streetworks, sustainability, Switzerland, tariffs, thames water, Thames Water, trading, unbundling, United Utilities, utility engineering, Vattenfall, vehicles, Veolia, waste management, wastewater, wastewater treatment, water, water abstraction, water distribution, water efficiency, water neutrality, water resources, water retail, water supply, water treatment, water uk, Water UK, weather, Welsh Power, Welsh Water, Wessex Water, Wics, wind, WWU, Yorkshire Water, zero-carbon development

< Five die, 12 injured, in blast at US power station site | French offshore company locates North Sea offshore HQ in Aberdeen >

Public more accepting of nuclear, less willing to pay for it

Written by: Janet Wood | 08 February 2010

Two thirds of customers are willing to accept new nuclear power stations to maintain security of electricity supplies, according to new research released by IBM. But the same proportion said they were unwilling to accept increased costs, even if it reduced carbon dioxide emissions.
The survey of 2000 people in November 2009, followed publication of the government's draft National Policy Statement on Energy.
IBM said that there was general acceptance of nuclear power as an alternative power source, but nearly 75 per cent of consumers polled believed that the case for new nuclear power had not been delivered with clarity.
Those in the youngest group, aged 18-24 years old, were least convinced that there is a requirement for new nuclear power stations given renewable sources of energy such as wind, wave and solar. At present nearly twice as many people surveyed rated full public consultation as more important than ensuring the plants are built on time - 47 per cent, compared to 24 per cent .

Tags: electricity generation, nuclear, policy

Comment on this story

Report Abuse

  1. Isn't this rather like asking people if thet accept the police force if they are able to reduce crime? The real question is whether nuclear IS required to maintain electricity supplies and there is a wealth of evidence to say it is not and that concentration on nuclear will damage the renewable sector!

    Pete Rowberry | 09 February 2010, 10:14 AM

  2. It is unfortunate that the public was not asked how it felt about highly radioactive nuclear waste being stored on the 10 new sites for around 160 years. It was good to learn that proper consultation is important to the public.

    Varrie Blowers | 09 February 2010, 02:31 PM